<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Physics on World of Dreams</title>
        <link>https://lightforever.cn/categories/physics/</link>
        <description>Recent content in Physics on World of Dreams</description>
        <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
        <language>zh-cn</language>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://lightforever.cn/categories/physics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
            <title>A brief summary of Chapter 7: MEAN FIELD THEORY OF PHASE TRANSITIONS</title>
            <link>https://lightforever.cn/2021/04/23/a-brief-summary-of-chapter-7-mean-field-theory-of-phase-transitions/</link>
            <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
            <guid>https://lightforever.cn/2021/04/23/a-brief-summary-of-chapter-7-mean-field-theory-of-phase-transitions/</guid>
            <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;chapter-7&#34;&gt;Chapter 7&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&lt;h2 id=&#34;74-mean-field-theory&#34;&gt;7.4 Mean Field Theory&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;the Ising model Hamiltonian,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\hat{H}=-J \sum_{\langle i j\rangle} \sigma_{i} \sigma_{j}-H \sum_{i} \sigma_{i}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$\text { We will write }\left\langle\sigma_{i}\right\rangle \equiv m$, then we have&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} \sigma_{i} \sigma_{j} &amp;amp;=\left(m+\delta \sigma_{i}\right)\left(m+\delta \sigma_{j}\right) \ &amp;amp;=m^{2}+m\left(\delta \sigma_{i}+\delta \sigma_{j}\right)+\delta \sigma_{i} \delta \sigma_{j} \ &amp;amp;=-m^{2}+m\left(\sigma_{i}+\sigma_{j}\right)+\delta \sigma_{i} \delta \sigma_{j} . \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;neglect the last term on RHS, substitute it in Hamiltonian,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\hat{H}&lt;em&gt;{\mathrm{MF}}=\frac{1}{2} N z J m^{2}-(H+z J m) \sum&lt;/em&gt;{i} \sigma_{i}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;define&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$H_{\mathrm{eff}}=H+z J m$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;which indicates the effective “mean field”.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We find the partition function of the canonical ensemble and the free energy that&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} Z &amp;amp;=\sum_{state} e^{-\beta \hat{H}} \ &amp;amp;=e^{-\frac{\beta}{2} N z J m^{2}} \cdot(2 \cosh \beta(H+2 J m))^{N} \end{aligned}\ \begin{aligned} F &amp;amp;=-K_{B} T \ln Z \ &amp;amp;=\frac{1}{2} N z J m^{2}-N K_{B} T \ln 2 \cosh \beta(H+z J m) \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;adimensionalize the free energy&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$f(m, h, \theta)=\frac{1}{2} m^{2}-\theta \ln \left(e^{(m+h) / \theta}+e^{-(m+h) / \theta}\right) .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We know that we have to minimize the free energy at equilibrium under constant volume and constant temperature, so we can get the mean field equation by differentiate $f$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m=\tanh \left(\frac{m+h}{\theta}\right)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;discussion:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(i) $h=0$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m=\tanh \left(\frac{m}{\theta}\right)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;if $\theta\ge 1$, one solution $m=0$. If $\theta &amp;lt;1$, three solutions and they are symmetric. It means spontaneous magnetization occurs at the point.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;so&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\theta_C=1$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/h0.gif&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;h0&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;is the mean field transition temperature, and its a second-order transition.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Also we find for $|\theta-1| \ll 1$,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m(\theta, h=0)=\pm \sqrt{3}(1-\theta)_{+}^{1 / 2}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;the exponent $\beta$ equals 1/2.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;now we compute the heat capacity. $\text { When } \theta \geqslant 1, m=0, \quad f=-\theta \ln 2 \quad c_{v}=0 \text { . }$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;when $\theta&amp;lt;1$,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$f=\frac{m^{2}}{2}-\theta\ln\left(2 \cosh \frac{m}{\theta}\right)$$ $$c_{V}=-\theta \frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial \theta^{2}}=\frac{1}{\theta} \cdot \frac{m^{2}(\theta)-m^{4}(\theta)}{\theta-1+m^{2}(\theta)}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;the calculation is not complex.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$\text { Let } \theta \rightarrow 1 \text { and use } m^{2} \simeq 3 \theta^{2}\left(1-\theta^{2}\right)$, we can obtain $c_V\rightarrow \frac32$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(ii)sets $\frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0$ and $\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial m^{2}}=0$ simultaneously, resulting in&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$h^{*}(\theta)=\sqrt{1-\theta}-\frac{\theta}{2} \ln \left(\frac{1+\sqrt{1-\theta}}{1-\sqrt{1-\theta}}\right) .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$\text { The solutions lie at } h=\pm h^{*}(\theta) . \text { For } \theta&amp;lt;\theta_{\mathrm{c}}=1 \text { and } h \in\left[-h^{*}(\theta),+h^{*}(\theta)\right]$, there are three solutions to the mean field equation&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/image-20210423131801885.png&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;image-20210423131801885&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Setting $\frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0$, we obtain&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\frac{1}{3} m^{3}+(\theta-1) \cdot m-h=0 \text { . }$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;still assumed $h \ll|\theta-1| \ll 1$,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;if $\theta &amp;gt;1$ we have&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m=h /(\theta-1)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;and we can obtain the &lt;em&gt;Curie-Weiss law&lt;/em&gt;, which shows the critical exponent $\gamma=1$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\chi(\theta)=\frac{\partial m}{\partial h}=\frac{1}{\theta-1} \propto|\theta-1|^{-\gamma}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;if $\theta &amp;lt;1$, the solution above becomes a maxima, and the minima is&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m(\theta, h)=\sqrt{3}(1-\theta)+\frac{h}{2(1-\theta)}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;the critical exponent $\gamma$ is also 1.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;if $\theta=1$,&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m\left(\theta=\theta_{\mathrm{c}}, h\right)=(3 h)^{1 / 3} \propto h^{1 / \delta}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In fact, it turns out that the mean field exponents are exact provided d &amp;gt; du, where du is the upper critical dimension of the theory. For the Ising model, du = 4, and above four dimensions (which is of course unphysical) the mean field exponents are in fact exact.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;dynamics&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/f.gif&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;f&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;75-variational-density-matrix-method&#34;&gt;7.5 Variational Density Matrix Method&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Suppose we are given a Hamiltonian $\hat{H}$. From this we construct the free energy, $F$ :&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} F &amp;amp;=E-T S \ &amp;amp;=\operatorname{Tr}(\varrho \hat{H})+k_{\mathrm{B}} T \operatorname{Tr}(\varrho \ln \varrho) \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Let us assume that ̺ is diagonal in the basis of eigenstates of ˆH , i.e.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\varrho=\sum_{\gamma} P_{\gamma}|\gamma\rangle\langle\gamma|$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;use it to calculate Ising model&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\hat{H}=-\sum_{i&amp;lt;j} J_{i j} \sigma_{i} \sigma_{j}-H \sum_{i} \sigma_{i}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We now write a trial density matrix which is a product over contributions from independent single sites:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\varrho_{N}\left(\sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2}, \ldots\right)=\prod_{i} \varrho\left(\sigma_{i}\right)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;where&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\varrho(\sigma)=\left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right) \delta_{\sigma, 1}+\left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right) \delta_{\sigma,-1} .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;adopt another notation&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\varrho=\left(\begin{array}{cc} \frac{1+m}{2} &amp;amp; 0 \ 0 &amp;amp; \frac{1-m}{2} \end{array}\right)\ \varrho_{N}=\varrho \otimes \varrho \otimes \cdots \otimes \varrho$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;so that we can use $Tr(A\otimes B)=Tr(A)Tr(B)$ to evaluate F and S:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} E &amp;amp;=\operatorname{Tr}\left(\varrho_{N} \hat{H}\right)=-\sum_{i&amp;lt;j} J_{i j} m^{2}-H \sum_{i} m \ &amp;amp;#038;=-\frac{1}{2} N \hat{J}(0) m^{2}-N H m \end{aligned} \ \begin{aligned} S &amp;amp;#038;=-k_{\mathrm{B}} \operatorname{Tr}\left(\varrho_{N} \ln \varrho_{N}\right)=-N k_{\mathrm{B}} \operatorname{Tr}(\varrho \ln \varrho) \ &amp;amp;#038;=-N k_{\mathrm{B}}\left\\left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right) \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right) \ln \left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right)\right\ . \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;and we can obtain the dimensionless free energy per site&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$f(m, h, \theta)=-\frac{1}{2} m^{2}-h m+\theta\left\\left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right) \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right)+\left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right) \ln \left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right)\right\$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;We extremize $f(m)$ by setting&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{array}{c} \frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0=-m-h+\frac{\theta}{2} \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{1-m}\right) . \ m=\tanh \left(\frac{m+h}{\theta}\right) \end{array}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;which is the same as the result of mean field theory. The discussion next is quite the same. In 7.10 we will see the equivalence of the two methods.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;76-landau-theory-of-phase-transitions&#34;&gt;7.6 Landau Theory of Phase Transitions&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;based on expansion of the free energy of a thermodynamic system in terms of an &lt;strong&gt;order parameter&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h4 id=&#34;1-quartic-free-energy&#34;&gt;(1) quartic free energy&#xA;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;$$f(m, h, \theta)=f_{0}+\frac{1}{2} a m^{2}+\frac{1}{4} b m^{4}-h m$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(i) h=0&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;symmetric&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0=a m+b m^{3}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;unique temperature θc where a(θc) = 0&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{array}{l} \theta&amp;lt;\theta_{\mathrm{c}} \quad: \quad f(\theta)=f_{0}-\frac{a^{2}}{4 b} \ \theta&amp;gt;\theta_{\mathrm{c}} \quad: \quad f(\theta)=f_{0} \end{array}$$ $$c\left(\theta_{\mathrm{c}}^{+}\right)-c\left(\theta_{\mathrm{c}}^{-}\right)=-\left.\theta_{\mathrm{c}} \frac{\partial^{2}}{\partial \theta^{2}}\right|&lt;em&gt;{\theta=\theta&lt;/em&gt;{\mathrm{c}}}\left(\frac{a^{2}}{4 b}\right)=-\frac{\theta_{\mathrm{c}}\left[a^{\prime}\left(\theta_{\mathrm{c}}\right)\right]^{2}}{2 b\left(\theta_{\mathrm{c}}\right)}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$\theta_C$二阶相变点，比热突变&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/1h0.png&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;1h0&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(ii)h≠0&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;asymmetric&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$b m^{3}+a m-h=0 .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$f^{\prime \prime}(m)=0$ as well as $f^{\prime}(m)=0$ we can obtain&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$a^{*}(h)=-\frac{3}{2^{2 / 3}} b^{1 / 3}|h|^{2 / 3}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/image-20210422163854536.png&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;image-20210422163854536&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$a&amp;lt;a^{*}(h)$, then there will be three real solutions to the mean field equation $f^{\prime}(m)=0$, one of which is a global minimum (the one for which $m \cdot h&amp;gt;0$ ).&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;For $a&amp;gt;a^{*}(h)$ one minima disappear and there is only a single global minimum&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;一阶相变&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h4 id=&#34;2-cubic-terms&#34;&gt;(2) cubic terms&#xA;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;$$f=f_{0}+\frac{1}{2} a m^{2}-\frac{1}{3} y m^{3}+\frac{1}{4} b m^{4}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0=a m-y m^{2}+b m^{3}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;we can obtain&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} a&amp;gt;\frac{y^{2}}{4 b} &amp;amp;: 1 \text { real root } m=0 \ \frac{y^{2}}{4 b}&amp;gt;a&amp;gt;\frac{2 y^{2}}{9 b} &amp;amp;: 3 \text { real roots; minimum at } m=0 \ \frac{2 y^{2}}{9 b}&amp;gt;a &amp;amp;: 3 \text { real roots; minimum at } m=\frac{y}{2 b}+\sqrt{\left(\frac{y}{2 b}\right)^{2}-\frac{a}{b}} \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;thus $y^{2}=\frac{9}{2} a b$ denotes a line of first order transitions&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/image-20210423115306054.png&#34; style=&#34;zoom:80%;&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; alt=&#34;image-20210423115306054&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;if we impose some dynamics on the system, adimensionalize the free energy&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m \equiv \frac{y}{b} \cdot u \quad, \quad a \equiv \frac{y^{2}}{b} \cdot r \quad, \quad t \equiv \frac{b}{\Gamma y^{2}} \cdot s \ \varphi(u)=\frac{1}{2} r u^{2}-\frac{1}{3} u^{3}+\frac{1}{4} u^{4} .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/3.gif&#34; style=&#34;zoom: 80%;&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; alt=&#34;3&#34; /&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/3-2.gif&#34; style=&#34;zoom: 80%;&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; alt=&#34;3-2&#34; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h4 id=&#34;3sixth-order-landau-theory--tricritical-point&#34;&gt;(3)Sixth order Landau theory : tricritical point&#xA;&lt;/h4&gt;&lt;p&gt;$$f=f_{0}+\frac{1}{2} a m^{2}+\frac{1}{4} b m^{4}+\frac{1}{6} c m^{6}\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0=m\left(a+b m^{2}+c m^{4}\right)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(i)$\text { If } a&amp;gt;0 \text { and } b&amp;gt;0$, $\text { a unique minimum at } m=0 \text { . }$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(ii)$\text { For } a&amp;lt;0$, One of the solutions is $m=0$. The other two are&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m=\pm \sqrt{-\frac{b}{2 c}+\sqrt{\left(\frac{b}{2 c}\right)^{2}-\frac{a}{c}}}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(iii)$a&amp;gt;0 \text { and } b&amp;lt;0$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} &amp;amp;\begin{aligned} b&amp;gt;-2 \sqrt{a c} &amp;amp;: &amp;amp; 1 \text { real root } m=0 \ -2 \sqrt{a c}&amp;gt;b&amp;gt;-\frac{4}{\sqrt{3}} \sqrt{a c} &amp;amp;: &amp;amp; 5 \text { real roots; minimum at } m=0 \end{aligned}\ &amp;amp;-\frac{4}{\sqrt{3}} \sqrt{a c}&amp;gt;b \quad: \quad 5 \text { real roots; minima at } m=\pm \sqrt{-\frac{b}{2 c}+\sqrt{\left(\frac{b}{2 c}\right)^{2}-\frac{a}{c}}} \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The point (a, b) = (0, 0), which lies at the confluence of a first order line and a second order line, is known as a tricritical point.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;dynamics&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$m \equiv \sqrt{\frac{|b|}{c}} \cdot u \quad, \quad a \equiv \frac{b^{2}}{c} \cdot r \quad, \quad t \equiv \frac{c}{\Gamma b^{2}} \cdot s .\ \varphi(u)=\frac{1}{2} r u^{2} \pm \frac{1}{4} u^{4}+\frac{1}{6} u^{6} .$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;https://lightforever.cn/img/external/raw.githubusercontent.com/Simonry-Hu/Picture/master/img/6.gif&#34; decoding=&#34;async&#34; referrerpolicy=&#34;no-referrer&#34; alt=&#34;6&#34; /&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;7113-canted-quantum-antiferromagnet&#34;&gt;7.11.3 Canted quantum antiferromagnet&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;Consider the following model for quantum $S=\frac{1}{2}$ spins:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\hat{H}=\sum_{\langle i j\rangle}\left[-J\left(\sigma_{i}^{x} \sigma_{j}^{x}+\sigma_{i}^{y} \sigma_{j}^{y}\right)+\Delta \sigma_{i}^{z} \sigma_{j}^{z}\right]+\frac{1}{4} K \sum_{\langle i j k l\rangle} \sigma_{i}^{z} \sigma_{j}^{z} \sigma_{k}^{z} \sigma_{l}^{z}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;we include a parameter α which describes the canting angle that the spins on these sublattices make with respect to the ˆx-axis.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;so the variational density matrix of each site is&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{array}{l} \varrho_{\mathrm{A}}=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2} m\left(\sin \alpha \sigma^{x}+\cos \alpha \sigma^{z}\right) \ \varrho_{\mathrm{B}}=\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2} m\left(\sin \alpha \sigma^{x}-\cos \alpha \sigma^{z}\right) \end{array}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Finally, the eigenvalues of $\varrho_{\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}}$ are still $\lambda_{\pm}=\frac{1}{2}(1 \pm m)$, hence&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} s(m) &amp;amp; \equiv-\operatorname{Tr}\left(\varrho_{\mathrm{A}} \ln \varrho_{\mathrm{A}}\right)=-\operatorname{Tr}\left(\varrho_{\mathrm{B}} \ln \varrho_{\mathrm{B}}\right) \ &amp;amp;=-\left[\frac{1+m}{2} \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{2}\right)+\frac{1-m}{2} \ln \left(\frac{1-m}{2}\right)\right] . \end{aligned}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;the calculation is similar to the 7.5, we can obtain the free energy and adimensionalize it&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{aligned} F &amp;amp;=\operatorname{Tr}(\varrho \hat{H})+k_{\mathrm{B}} T \operatorname{Tr}(\varrho \ln \varrho) \ &amp;amp;=-2 N\left(J \sin ^{2} \alpha+\Delta \cos ^{2} \alpha\right) m^{2}+\frac{1}{4} N K m^{4} \cos ^{4} \alpha-N k_{\mathrm{B}} T s(m) \end{aligned}\ f(m, \alpha)=-\frac{1}{2} m^{2}+\frac{1}{2}(1-\delta) m^{2} \cos ^{2} \alpha+\frac{1}{4} \kappa m^{4} \cos ^{4} \alpha-\theta s(m)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;in it, $f \equiv F / 4 N J,\delta \equiv \Delta / J, \kappa \equiv K / 4 J, \text { and } \theta \equiv k_{\mathrm{B}} T / 4 J$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;similarly to find its minima, we have&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\begin{array}{l} \frac{\partial f}{\partial m}=0=-m+(1-\delta) m \cos ^{2} \alpha+\kappa m^{3} \cos ^{4} \alpha+\frac{1}{2} \theta \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{1-m}\right) \ \frac{\partial f}{\partial \alpha}=0=\left(1-\delta+\kappa m^{2} \cos ^{2} \alpha\right) m^{2} \sin \alpha \cos \alpha \end{array}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;and we can obtain&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\cos ^{2} \alpha=\left\\begin{array}{ll} 0 &amp;amp; \text { if } \delta&amp;lt;1 \ (\delta-1) / \kappa m^{2} &amp;amp;#038; \text { if } 1 \leq \delta \leq 1+\kappa m^{2} \ 1 &amp;amp;#038; \text { if } \delta \geq 1+\kappa m^{2} \end{array}\right.$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;discussion:&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(i)$\delta&amp;lt;1$, $\cos \alpha=0$, $m=\tanh (m / \theta)$, so A and B have no difference in angles. The solution is the same as discussed above.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(ii)$1&amp;lt;\delta&amp;lt;1+\kappa m^{2}$, we have canting with an angle&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\alpha=\alpha^{*}(m)=\cos ^{-1} \sqrt{\frac{\delta-1}{\kappa m^{2}}}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$\text { we can also obtain the relation } m=\tanh (m / \theta)$, and the boundary is&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\theta_{0}=\frac{m_{0}}{\tanh ^{-1}\left(m_{0}\right)}&amp;lt;1 \quad ; \quad m_{0}=\sqrt{\frac{\delta-1}{\kappa}}$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;(iii)$\theta&amp;gt;\theta_{0} \text { , we have } \delta&amp;gt;1+\kappa m^{2} \text { , and we must take } \cos ^{2} \alpha=1 \text { . }$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;$$\delta m-\kappa m^{3}=\frac{\theta}{2} \ln \left(\frac{1+m}{1-m}\right)$$&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;through this equation we can obtain m.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;</description>
        </item></channel>
</rss>
